Friday, December 26, 2025

Amazon failure exposes our dangerous digital dependencies

The internet can seem like an endless sea of different websites and apps. But it increasingly depends on a small cluster of giant companies to keep it running.

In recent years, internet businesses have outsourced much of their IT operations to cloud computing providers Amazon, Microsoft and Google.

Today, services from online banking to messaging apps rely on the cloud, as does the Government’s login system that is soon to power Labour’s digital ID scheme.

It is seen as a mutually beneficial arrangement. Instead of every company having to buy their own servers and networking equipment, the likes of Amazon build cavernous data centres, renting out space and providing tech support.

Smaller companies avoid the upfront cost of buying IT equipment, while the so-called hyperscalers which run cloud services see a handsome return on their investment. AWS, Amazon’s cloud computing arm, is the biggest of these, and almost twice as profitable as its retail division.

Cloud computing has become a utility. And, like electricity or water, it is only when something goes wrong that questions are asked.

On Monday morning, dozens of services including Lloyds Bank, HMRC and the video game Fortnite were knocked offline by a technical error related to Amazon’s cloud servers on the US east coast.

Users of Ring doorbells and security systems found they were unable to activate emergency alarms. People using the messaging app Snapchat found that their friend lists had been deleted. Language learners on Duolingo fretted that their precious learning streaks would be reset.

More than 1,000 services were affected, according to Down Detector, which monitors website crashes.

Amazon provided regular updates on the source of the problem – a technical glitch related to how web services accessed information from databases – and said it had been resolved within a few hours.

But the episode shone a light on how much of the internet relies on a single point of failure, and led to questions about handing over responsibility to a small club of cloud providers.

AWS accounts for more than a third of the $172bn (£128bn) cloud infrastructure market, according to Gartner, making it the single biggest provider. The two biggest providers, Amazon and Microsoft, control more than 60pc of spending, with Google a distant third.

The next two biggest players are the Chinese companies Alibaba and Huawei, which few Western firms rely on, making the market effectively a three-way fight.

“The outage highlights how deeply the internet depends on a few dominant cloud providers,” said Grace Harmon, an analyst at eMarketer.

IT experts said companies were to blame for failing to have backup providers. “All these big companies have relied on just one service – AWS – without planning for redundancy,” said Nishanth Sastry, of the University of Surrey’s department of computer science. “When something extraordinary like this happens, we are all wrong-footed.”

Critics said Monday’s blackout should act as a wake-up call to break Amazon and Microsoft’s grip over the cloud market.

The Open Cloud Coalition, backed by Google, said the blackout was “a visceral reminder of the risks of over-reliance on two dominant cloud providers, an outage most of us will have felt in some way”. It called for a market where “no single provider can bring so much of our digital world to a standstill”.

So far, regulators have been reluctant to take action.

A recent investigation by Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority found that Microsoft and Amazon often make it hard to use smaller rivals, charging expensive fees for moving data. However, the watchdog has not yet taken any action, putting the matter on hold until next year.

The Bank of England has demanded that financial firms become more resilient to cloud computing outages. A spokesman said on Monday that the Bank was “in close contact with firms”.

Under new financial laws, the Treasury is able to designate AWS as a “critical third party” to the economy. It is yet to do so, but Monday’s internet crash may be the moment that officials start paying more attention to who really keeps the internet running.

Source link

Hot this week

Transition Towards Defense Technology Driving Up Sentiment for Redwire (RDW)

Redwire Corporation (NYSE:RDW) is one of...

Health care does not need the PPP route

Public policies have single or multiple objectives. Policy for...

Here is What Analysts Have to Say About Bowman Consulting (BWMN)

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:BWMN) is...

Topics

Related Articles

Popular Categories