Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Korea’s competition policies targeting U.S. companies could trigger nearly $1 trillion in economic losses for both countries

  • New research from the Competere Foundation shows the U.S. could lose an estimated $525B; Korean economy, small businesses would suffer $469B in losses.

  • The US and Korea are negotiating a trade deal to lower the high tariff imposed on Korea by the US. Reforms to Korea’s regulatory culture could be a landing zone for both parties.

WASHINGTON, Oct. 21, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Korea’s discriminatory competition policies – which often undermine U.S. companies’ ability to operate in Korea – could trigger a combined $1 trillion in economic losses for both countries over the next 10 years, with the U.S. poised to suffer the biggest losses.

The U.S. would lose an estimated $525 billion if Korean officials continue to enact policies that limit American technology companies’ ability to offer key services to Korean customers, including online retail, social media, mapping and other logistics services offered by Apple, Coupang, Google, Microsoft and others.

The problematic policies – including aggressive regulatory enforcement by the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) – stem from officials’ claims that American firms have an unfair advantage over Korean businesses and are designed to give Korean regulators decision power over which companies win or lose in the market.

According to new research by the Competere Foundation, a non-profit foundation focused on educating policymakers about non-tariff barriers impacting global GDP, regulations in Korea could cost the average American household roughly $3,800 in economic losses over the next 10 years, and exacerbate ongoing trade challenges between the U.S. and Korea.

Korea itself could also lose an estimated $469 billion due to discriminatory regulations that disincentivize foreign direct investment, which will disproportionately impact and damage the country’s micro, small and medium businesses (MSMEs).

Aggressive regulatory frameworks in Korea – including the proposed Fairness in Online Brokerage Transaction Act, the Online Platform Monopoly Act (PMA), and various anti-competition laws being enforced through the KFTC – are increasingly designed to handicap larger American firms by subjecting them to excessive regulatory requirements that obstruct free market competition in favor of Korean companies, which creates downstream costs for U.S. consumers.

However, the research also shows that by addressing the U.S. governments’ concerns about disproportionate regulation of American firms, Korea can avoid economic losses and reclaim significant foreign investment opportunities.

Source link

Hot this week

Apple’s leadership shift marks a ‘major reset’ in AI strategy

This is The Takeaway from today's...

Twice-a-year HIV prevention shots begin in Africa

South Africa, Eswatini and Zambia on Monday began...

Airline Pilots Hide Mental Health Struggles to Keep Flying

Annie Vargas could see her son slipping away...

Hermès Heir Takes Aim at LVMH’s Arnault in Civil Lawsuit

Hermès heir Nicolas Puech has sued Bernard Arnault...

Retail and Institutional Demand Drives Britannia’s LME Membership Following Leadership Hires

Britannia Global Markets, an FCA-regulated firm specialising in derivatives broking...

Topics

Twice-a-year HIV prevention shots begin in Africa

South Africa, Eswatini and Zambia on Monday began...

Airline Pilots Hide Mental Health Struggles to Keep Flying

Annie Vargas could see her son slipping away...

Hermès Heir Takes Aim at LVMH’s Arnault in Civil Lawsuit

Hermès heir Nicolas Puech has sued Bernard Arnault...

Retail and Institutional Demand Drives Britannia’s LME Membership Following Leadership Hires

Britannia Global Markets, an FCA-regulated firm specialising in derivatives broking...

American Eagle Outfitters Raises Annual Sales Forecast

American Eagle Outfitters raised its annual comparable sales...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img