VBR is far larger and more liquid than ISCV, but it carries a slightly higher expense ratio
ISCV holds more stocks and leans more toward financials, while VBR tilts toward industrials.
Both funds posted similar five-year drawdowns, but VBR delivered marginally higher five-year growth.
These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›
Both the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT:VBR) and the iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT:ISCV) target U.S. small-cap value stocks, but they track different indexes and show subtle differences in sector allocations and holdings.
VBR stands out for its massive assets under management and trading liquidity, while ISCV offers a marginally lower expense ratio and broader stock exposure. This matchup looks at cost, performance, risk, and portfolio makeup to help clarify which may appeal more to investors seeking diversified value in the small-cap space.
Metric | ISCV | VBR
|
|---|
Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.07% |
1-yr return (as of Dec. 22, 2025) | 10.72% | 7.98% |
Dividend yield | 1.89% | 1.97% |
Beta (5Y monthly) | 1.22 | 1.12 |
AUM | $575 million | $60 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
ISCV comes in slightly more affordable on fees with a lower expense ratio, but the difference is minimal. ISCV also edges out VBR on yield, though both funds offer similar payouts for income-focused investors.
Metric | ISCV | VBR |
|---|
Max drawdown (5 y) | -25.34% | -24.19% |
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $1,513 | $1,531 |
VBR tracks a broad mix of U.S. small-cap value stocks, with the largest sector allocations in industrials (19% of total assets), financial services (18%), and consumer cyclicals (13%). The fund holds 840 stocks, with top positions in NRG Energy, Sandisk, and EMCOR Group. Backed by over two decades of history and around $60 billion in assets under management, VBR’s scale supports robust liquidity and efficient trading.
ISCV, meanwhile, holds nearly 1,100 stocks and leans more heavily toward financial services (21%), consumer cyclicals (16%), and industrials (13%). Its top holdings include Sandisk, Rocket Companies, and Annaly Capital Management. While it is much smaller in AUM, ISCV offers even broader diversification within the small-cap value segment.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Investing in small-cap stocks can be a smart way to diversify your portfolio and gain exposure to stocks with impressive growth potential. Because smaller companies can be more volatile than their larger counterparts, investing in a small-cap ETF can help mitigate risk.
Both VRB and ISCV are exclusively focused on small-cap value stocks, but they have slightly different strengths and weaknesses.
ISCV is the more diversified of the two, with 256 more stocks than VRB. However, despite this diversification, it’s experienced marginally higher levels of volatility over the past five years with a higher beta and slightly steeper max drawdown than VBR. While the difference is subtle, it’s a factor to consider for investors concerned about risk.
The two funds also differ in their top sectors, with ISCV focused more on financial services and VBR tilted toward industrials. For investors who have a preference when it comes to sector diversification, this could be a deciding factor.
With similar fee structures and dividend yields, these two funds are essentially equal in terms of costs and income. But VBR’s significantly higher AUM results in greater liquidity — meaning it will be easier for investors to buy and sell shares without affecting the ETF’s price.
For long-term investors who don’t plan to sell anytime soon, liquidity may not be a selling point. But when most other differences between these two ETFs are marginal, it’s something for investors to keep in mind.
ETF: Exchange-traded fund; a fund that trades on stock exchanges like a stock, holding a basket of assets.
Expense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges to cover operating costs.
Assets under management (AUM): The total market value of assets a fund manages on behalf of investors.
Liquidity: How easily an asset or fund can be bought or sold in the market without affecting its price.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund or stock, expressed as a percentage of its current price.
Beta: A measure of an investment’s volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
Drawdown: The decline from a fund’s peak value to its lowest point over a specific period.
Small-cap: Refers to companies with relatively small total market values, typically between $300 million and $2 billion.
Value stocks: Stocks considered undervalued compared to their fundamentals, often trading at lower price-to-earnings ratios.
Sector allocation: The distribution of a fund’s investments across different industry sectors.
Diversification: Spreading investments across various assets to reduce risk.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $489,202!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $52,090!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $504,994!*
Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
See the 3 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of December 22, 2025
Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends EMCOR Group and Rocket Companies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
VBR vs. ISCV: Which Small-Cap Value ETF Is the Better Buy for Investors? was originally published by The Motley Fool
