Friday, January 23, 2026

Gen Z is cutting back on retirement savings

A surprising number of Gen Zers between 18 and 29 have hit the brakes on retirement savings in the past six months.

More than 6 in 10 of the oldest Gen Zers say they have stopped or reduced their retirement savings, compared with 46% of Gen X and 36% of boomers, according to a new study from Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America.

Two-thirds of these Gen Z folks added that they haven’t been able to contribute to savings as much as they’d like because of other demands for their cash.

“Gen Z may feel like they can afford to cut back on retirement savings now — they have decades until they will likely stop working,” Kelly LaVigne, vice president of Consumer Insights at Allianz Life, told Yahoo Finance.

That’s troubling for a variety of reasons, but the biggest is the toll it will take on their future retirement stockpile.

Read more: How to catch up on retirement savings

These choices, difficult as they are, will have repercussions later on.

“By reducing retirement expenses, they are stealing from their future selves,” LaVigne said. “Time in the market is crucial when saving for long-term financial goals like retirement. Without that time in the market on your side, Gen Zers who pull back on retirement savings now will need to save a greater dollar amount later on.”

Here’s how the math works out: With a base assumption of 5% return and $300 per month savings, if you begin at age 25, you will contribute a total of $144,000 and have $460,000 at age 65.

If you begin at age 35, you will contribute a total of $108,000 and have $251,000 at age 65. If you begin at age 45 and double your monthly contribution to $600, you will have $359,000 at age 65.

Read more: How much should I contribute to my 401(k)?

“It’s the time value of money,” Tricia Rosen, a financial planner and founder of Access Financial Planning, told Yahoo Finance. “The numbers illustrate that a small amount now, even with a conservative return assumption, will be very impactful at age 65.

“Time value of money is so powerful that even doubling the contribution halfway to age 65 still can’t make up the lost ground from not starting at age 25.”

I can empathize with these 20-somethings. It’s hard to envision a time 40 years down the runway to retirement when these small amounts will make a difference.

“Younger generations have a lot to contend with,” Fiona Greig, Vanguard’s global head of investor research and policy, wrote in a recent report. “Rising debt, inflation, and health care and housing costs have put pressure on these generations’ capacity to save.”

Source link

Hot this week

Topics

Related Articles

Popular Categories