Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img

Aussie Regulators Propose Full Licensing and Stronger Consumer Protections for Crypto

Australia is stepping up its oversight of digital assets, aiming to bring crypto exchanges and custody providers under the same rules as traditional financial institutions. The...
HomePersonal Finance'I Don't Feel He Prioritizes Joint Decisions' — Woman Upset As 41-Year-Old...

‘I Don’t Feel He Prioritizes Joint Decisions’ — Woman Upset As 41-Year-Old Chooses $20,000 Boat Parts Over $5,000 Wedding

A 34-year-old woman said she is reconsidering her engagement after discovering her fiancé, 41, spent $20,000 on race boat parts instead of saving for their $5,000 wedding. She posted on Reddit that they had agreed to postpone their October elopement until next year to keep finances stable, but she said the purchase showed he was prioritizing his hobby over shared decisions.

The couple shares a 2-year-old child, and the man has two children from a prior relationship. She said all the children are close, and both parents treat them equally. 

Don’t Miss:

The pair also manages money through separate personal accounts, a joint household account, and a business account. Their joint funds, she explained, are earmarked for projects such as installing air conditioning at home, with plans to later save for a motorbike trailer for family use.

Wedding Plans Postponed

The bride-to-be said they had been engaged for 1.5 years after dating for five. Their small wedding budget — about $5,000 — covered attire, rings, photography, and a celebrant. The couple had agreed to delay the event, along with a planned honeymoon in the U.S., so they could save without straining other obligations.

But she later learned her fiancé had spent $20,000 on boat parts. She said the money could have covered nearly half the ceremony and expressed frustration that she also lost her deposit for the October date.

Trending: 7 Million Gamers Already Trust Gameflip With Their Digital Assets — Now You Can Own a Stake in the Platform

She told him his actions felt selfish. “I don’t feel he prioritizes joint decisions we make,” she said. While she has supported his racing hobby, she explained she expected him to limit spending until they were financially secure.

Her fiancé argued that he used his personal money and said postponing the wedding meant there was no conflict. He reportedly told her to “get down off my high horse and stop carrying on with unnecessary BS.” The woman said his response left her reconsidering whether to move forward with marriage.

See Also: Backed by $300M+ in Assets and Microsoft’s Climate Fund, Farmland LP Opens Vital Farmland III to Accredited Investors

Flowers, Apology, And New Agreement

In an update, she said her fiancé later apologized and admitted his purchase was wrong. He assured her that “the boat is not more important than me” and brought her flowers. He also promised to stop spending on his race boat until household expenses were covered.

The couple agreed to continue prioritizing bills through their joint account and revisit wedding discussions next year if finances improve. For now, she said her focus remains on stability for their family.

Read Next: Have $100k+ to invest? Charlie Munger says that’s the toughest milestone — don’t stall now. Get matched with a fiduciary advisor and keep building

Image: Shutterstock

[

Source link