If You’d Bought 100 Shares of Realty Income 10 Years Ago, Here’s the Dividend Check You’d Be Cashing Today

So, you bought into the Realty Income (NYSE: O) stock a decade ago, and you’re wondering just how much you’re collecting in dividends now. Let’s take a look. First, remember that Realty Income is a real estate investment trust (REIT), so it’s required to pay out at least 90% of its income as dividends. (REITs…


If You’d Bought 100 Shares of Realty Income 10 Years Ago, Here’s the Dividend Check You’d Be Cashing Today

So, you bought into the Realty Income (NYSE: O) stock a decade ago, and you’re wondering just how much you’re collecting in dividends now. Let’s take a look.

First, remember that Realty Income is a real estate investment trust (REIT), so it’s required to pay out at least 90% of its income as dividends. (REITs typically own lots of properties, leasing them out to tenants.) It sports a significant dividend yield — 5.35%, as of March 25.

Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire?ย Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an “Indispensable Monopoly” providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need.ย Continue ยป

A couple is standing outside a house, smiling with sunlight beaming behind them.
Image source: Getty Images.

Interestingly, while most dividend-paying stocks pay quarterly, Realty Income pays its shareholders monthly. Its most recent payment is $0.2705 per share, to be paid on April 15.

Now, let’s get to the math. If you bought 100 shares in 2016, would you still have 100 shares today? Not quite, because the company executed a stock split in 2021 — and an unusual one, at that — giving shareholders 1,032 shares for every 1,000 shares they own. If you owned 100 shares, presumably you’d have ended up with around 103 shares post-split. So, multiply 103 shares by the per-share dividend of $0.2705 for April, and you’ll arrive at a monthly dividend payment of $27.86. The run rate for the year is about $334.

The shares closed near $57 on April 1, 2016, so if you’d bought then, you’d have spent around $5,700 for your shares. If you’re collecting $334 annually from a $5,700 investment, you’ve got an effective dividend yield of 5.86%. It’s higher than the current 5.35% yield because that’s what those buying the stock today would be getting.

Should you invest in the stock today? Well, maybe. The stock offers fairly reliable income, as it has paid nearly 670 consecutive monthly dividends and has increased its dividend 134 times since it was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 1994.

Its business model features triple-net leases, which have tenants paying for real estate taxes, property insurance, and operating expenses in exchange for modest rent increases.

Give Realty Income — or other promising dividend payers — some consideration.

Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are theย 10 best stocks for investors to buy nowโ€ฆ and Realty Income wasnโ€™t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation,ย youโ€™d have $503,268!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, youโ€™d have $1,049,793!*

Now, itโ€™s worth notingย Stock Advisorโ€™s total average return is 898% โ€” a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500.ย Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available withย Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks ยป

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 27, 2026.

Selena Maranjian has positions in Realty Income. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

If You’d Bought 100 Shares of Realty Income 10 Years Ago, Here’s the Dividend Check You’d Be Cashing Today was originally published by The Motley Fool

Source link