Sequence Risk: Why First Five Years Of Retirement Matter Most

Two retirees begin retirement with identical portfolios. They withdraw the same percentage of their savings each year. They experience the same average market returns over decades. Yet one runs out of money early, while the other maintains a comfortable income through retirement. The difference between their outcomes comes down to when market gains and losses…


Sequence Risk: Why First Five Years Of Retirement Matter Most
Sequence Risk: Why First Five Years Of Retirement Matter Most

Two retirees begin retirement with identical portfolios. They withdraw the same percentage of their savings each year. They experience the same average market returns over decades. Yet one runs out of money early, while the other maintains a comfortable income through retirement. The difference between their outcomes comes down to when market gains and losses occur.

This is the essence of sequence of returns risk โ€” the idea that the order of investment returns matters, not just the average return itself. When retirees withdraw money during a downturn, they lock in losses.ย 

Early negative years can shrink a portfolio in a way that later market gains may not fully undo โ€” especially in the first years after retirement, when portfolios are largest, and withdrawals begin. Financial research across multiple institutions highlights the importance of this timing effect for retirement outcomes.

What Is Sequence Risk?

Sequence risk refers to the threat that market losses early in retirement can reduce a portfolio much more quickly than losses that occur later. In a situation where money is only contributed and not withdrawn, the sequence of returns doesn’t really matter.ย 

Over many years, gains and losses average out. However, in retirement, when regular withdrawals are made, the order becomes critical.

When markets fall early in retirement, and you still need to take money out, fewer assets remain to benefit from future rebounds. If the same drop occurs later, when fewer withdrawals are required, and the portfolio is smaller, the impact on long-term income tends to be less severe.ย 

Research tied this risk to withdrawal strategies decades ago, including early work by William Bengen, whose safe withdrawal rate studies implicitly account for this timing effect.

Why the First Five Years Matter Most

A simple example makes the concept practical. Imagine a retiree with a $1 million portfolio who follows a 4% withdrawal rate, meaning $40,000 a year for living expenses.

If the market falls 20% in the first year:

The portfolio drops to $800,000.

After a $40,000 withdrawal, it sits at $760,000.

If markets increase 25% the following year, the value of that $760,000 will be $950,000, which is less than the initial value of 1 million. Since the portfolio was low at the time of the withdrawals, the number of shares/assets to be involved in the recovery process is lower.