US judge approves Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement of copyright lawsuit

By Blake Brittain July 20 (Reuters) – A federal judge in San Francisco on Monday signed off on artificial intelligence company Anthropic’s landmark $1.5 billion settlement โ€Œof a class action lawsuit brought by a group of authors who accused โ€Œit of misusing their books to train its AI chatbot Claude. U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin…


US judge approves Anthropic’s .5 billion settlement of copyright lawsuit

By Blake Brittain

July 20 (Reuters) – A federal judge in San Francisco on Monday signed off on artificial intelligence company Anthropic’s landmark $1.5 billion settlement โ€Œof a class action lawsuit brought by a group of authors who accused โ€Œit of misusing their books to train its AI chatbot Claude.

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin โ€‹said that she would grant final approval of the settlement, the largest known settlement of a U.S. copyright case.

The case is one of dozens brought by copyright owners including authors and news outlets against tech companies over the training โ€Œof their large language models, โ and the first major U.S. case to settle.

Now-retired Judge William Alsup initially greenlit the deal last September.

The writers sued Anthropic in 2024, โ arguing that the company, which is backed by Amazon and Alphabet, used pirated versions of their books without permission to teach Claude to respond to human โ€‹prompts.

Alsup ruled last โ€‹June that Anthropic made fair use โ€‹of the authors’ work to โ€Œtrain Claude, but found that the company violated their rights by saving more than 7 million pirated books to a “central library” that would not necessarily be used for AI training. A trial was scheduled to begin last December to determine how much Anthropic owed for the alleged piracy, with potential โ€Œdamages running into the hundreds of billions โ€‹of dollars.

Authors and other copyright holders filed claims โ€‹covering over 92% of the โ€‹more than 480,000 works included in the settlement, an attorney โ€Œfor the authors said during a โ€‹court hearing. The โ€‹settlement also spurred objections from some authors who have argued it is not large enough, overcompensates the plaintiffs’ attorneys or wrongly excludes some โ€‹copyright owners.

Some authors and โ€Œpublishers opted out of the settlement and have filed separate โ€‹lawsuits against Anthropic that are still ongoing.

(Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington, Editing โ€‹by Alexia Garamfalvi and Sanjeev Miglani)

Source link