Apple Stock Offers a Different Way to Bet on the Future of AI
The sharp rally in AI chipmakers is beginning to lose momentum. Investors are questioning whether hyperscalers can make returns that justify their massive investments, with some quietly preparing for a slowdown in the nearly $1 trillion AI spending cycle. According to UBS estimates, hyperscalers’ capex will rise 76% this year to $673 billion, but will…
The sharp rally in AI chipmakers is beginning to lose momentum. Investors are questioning whether hyperscalers can make returns that justify their massive investments, with some quietly preparing for a slowdown in the nearly $1 trillion AI spending cycle.
According to UBS estimates, hyperscalers’ capex will rise 76% this year to $673 billion, but will increase by only 25% next year and just 6% in 2028. Though these entities have initially funded the AI buildout through their own cash, hyperscalers are now turning to external financing which raises huge questions on capital-market pressures and spending growth.
Lower-cost competition from China is adding another layer of uncertainty to the AI investment landscape. In latest news, Beijing-based startup Moonshot AI has launched Kimi K3, a 2.8-trillion-parameter model that claims to close the gap with leading U.S. offerings and even surpasses OpenAI and Anthropic’s most capable systems on some benchmarks.
Kimi K3’s release is a testament to the possibility of increasingly capable AI models made available at substantially cheaper prices in the future. This will eventually weaken the pricing power of those selling proprietary AI services.
Morgan Stanley analyst Gary Yu views the release of Kimi K3 as an all-round catch-up of LLMs:
“K3 has received positive feedback globally, signaling an all-round catch-up of Chinese LLMs with US leaders in model size, performance, and pricing. K3, the largest open-weight Chinese LLM so far, may suggest the scaling law still holds… We do not view K3 as an overnight miracle but rather as the result of cumulative progress across China’s AI model industry.”
If AI becomes cheaper, companies may begin to use lower-cost models for routine tasks and save the advanced ones for complex work. However, if this happens, model developers and cloud providers may find it harder to generate attractive returns on their costly infrastructure investments.
This is what makes Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) an interesting contrast, relying more on on-device AI and less on massive data center spending. This contrast particularly became evident on July 17, with Apple briefly unseating Nvidia and becoming the world’s most valuable company. Reclaiming the top spot since the first time since April of last year, Apple’s s move to the top was a reflection of how investors are reassessing their outlook of artificial intelligence.
“Apple was seen as a laggard in the AI race because it wasn’t spending to develop models, but now sentiment has changed,” said Toni Meadows, head of investment at BRI Wealth Management.
“Apple is less exposed to capex intensity and better positioned to monetize AI via services, ecosystem lock-in, and hardware upgrades. The re-rating reflects confidence in earnings durability rather than speculative AI upside.”
Previously known to be an AI laggard, Wall Street now believes Apple’s AI agenda and light capital spending model will eventually make it an AI star. HSBC recently upgraded the stock to a buy rating, citing its AI capabilities and innovative pipeline.
“This AI boost comes at the right moment, when we think Apple has one of its most innovative product pipelines in place,” they wrote.
It’s true, analysts are now praising Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) for its wait-and-see strategy, letting the rivals take on the task of research and development along the way. The company’s latest iOS public beta gives regular users the opportunity to try its redesigned, large-language model powered Siri.
Even though Siri’s core architecture and standalone application are Apple developments, Apple has also formed strategic partnerships with AI leaders such as Google and OpenAI, integrating their Large Language Models (LLMs) into Apple’s ecosystem for advanced generative AI features.
This way, Apple’s AI strategy of side-stepping the capital-intensity trap facing hyperscalers may turn out to be a huge win. The company relies on cloud partners for the most compute-intensive workloads, while also retaining control of its consumers. Meanwhile, its AI features support Services revenue and strengthen eco-system lock-in.
Turning to the bull case, cheaper AI shifts value away from whoever owns the most expensive model to the one who controls distribution. This means Apple can use AI to sell more devices and services across its enormous established base without having to spend massively on infrastructure. The company already boasts an installed base with more than 2.5 billion active devices, a testament to “incredible customer satisfaction for the very best products and services in the world.”
The bear case, however, centers on valuation friction. At nearly $330 per share, the stock trades at around 36 times expected fiscal 2026 earnings, which is well above its historical average of roughly 19 times. Apple trades at a premium multiple that assumes it can sustain steady earnings growth despite the mature nature of its hardware replacement cycle. This could become a risk if consumers see little reason to upgrade their iPhones for AI features, particularly in cases where open-source models run smoothly on browsers or old devices. In such a case, Apple’s premium valuation may be harder to justify.
Hedge funds appeared relatively cautious on Apple at the end of March. According to Insider Monkey’s hedge fund database, 170 hedge funds held stakes in Apple at the end of Q1 2026, compared with 282 funds holding Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT), 275 holding NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA), and 265 holding Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL). However, these fillings only reflect positions till the end of March, and do not capture Apple’s subsequent gains of 30%.
Short sellers also appear relatively cautious, with Apple’s short float at an estimated 0.96%. This is below NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)’s 1.33%, and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)’s 1.20%. However, it is above Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL)’s 0.80%. The company’s short interest also declined during the last reporting period, falling an estimated -2.58% to 140.53 million shares, down from the previous 144.25 million shares.
While the stock has fewer hedge fund holders than its peers, Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s subsequent rally and improving short interest suggests that investor sentiment is changing toward the stock and possibly paving a different way to bet on the future of AI.
While we acknowledge the risk and potential of AAPL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some other AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and doing so within a shorter time frame. If you are looking for an AI stock that is much cheaper than AAPL and that has 10,000% upside potential, check out our report about the cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: 33 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and Cathie Wood 2026 Portfolio: 10 Best Stocks to Buy.
Disclosure: None. Follow Insider Monkey on Google News.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
