Musk touts California robotaxis but Tesla does nothing to get permits

By Chris Kirkham LOS ANGELES, Feb 26 (Reuters) – For more than a year, Elon Musk has repeatedly said Tesla is months away from launching a driverless robotaxi service in California โ€“ once state regulators give their blessing. Tesla did nothing to secure that approval in 2025, according โ€Œto previously unreported state Department of Motor…


Musk touts California robotaxis but Tesla does nothing to get permits
Musk touts California robotaxis but Tesla does nothing to get permits

By Chris Kirkham

LOS ANGELES, Feb 26 (Reuters) – For more than a year, Elon Musk has repeatedly said Tesla is months away from launching a driverless robotaxi service in California โ€“ once state regulators give their blessing.

Tesla did nothing to secure that approval in 2025, according โ€Œto previously unreported state Department of Motor Vehicles records and a state spokesperson. Tesla logged zero miles of autonomous test driving on California โ€Œroads last year for the sixth year in a row, the records show.

Documenting test miles is critical in Californiaโ€™s regulatory system for robotaxis, which requires companies to progress through a series of โ€‹permits before being allowed to operate a driverless ride-hailing service such as Alphabet’s Waymo.

Much of Teslaโ€™s $1.5 trillion market value is tied to investorsโ€™ belief that it will soon operate a vast fleet of robotaxis and sell millions of autonomous-driving software subscriptions. Operating driverless vehicles in California โ€“ the largest U.S. auto market โ€“ is a linchpin of those ambitions.

Bryant Walker Smith, a University of South Carolina law professor and autonomous-driving expert who has consulted for the California DMV, said Tesla is implying that โ€œthey are ready โ€Œand regulators are not,โ€ while the reality is that โ€œregulators โ are ready, and they are not.โ€

Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. On an earnings call in October, Musk told analysts that the company is “paranoid about safety” and that it takes a “cautious approach” to new markets. “We probably could just let โ it loose in these cities,” he said, “but we just don’t want to take a chance.”

So far, Tesla operates only a small pilot robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, which has far fewer regulatory barriers than California.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, the company last July started operating what it called a โ€œrobotaxiโ€ service that was not a robotaxi service โ€‹at all. โ€‹Instead, it is a chauffeur service with human drivers who use Teslaโ€™s โ€œFull Self-Drivingโ€ driver-assistance โ€‹software, which is not fully autonomous, according to the state โ€Œregulator authorizing the service and Teslaโ€™s disclosures to customers.

In order to operate fully self-driving vehicles in California, like Waymo, Tesla would first need to obtain permits to test and operate driverless vehicles from the state’s DMV and Public Utilities Commission, which regulates commercial ride-hailing.

Tesla so far has only the entry-level DMV permit, which allows testing driverless vehicles only with a human safety monitor in the driverโ€™s seat. A DMV spokesperson said Tesla has not applied for any additional permits.

Tesla would need to log at least 50,000 miles (80,467 km) of autonomous driving on public roads in California with a safety driver before applying for a different permit allowing โ€Œtesting without one, according to proposed DMV regulations expected to be finalized later this year.

Tesla โ€‹has not logged any miles with state regulators since 2019 and has documented only 562 โ€‹miles in total since 2016.

Waymo, by comparison, logged more than 13 million โ€‹testing miles and secured seven different regulatory approvals between 2014 and 2023, when it received approval to charge passengers for โ€Œrides in driverless robotaxis. Waymo is one of three companies with California โ€‹permits to commercially operate driverless vehicles and โ€‹the only one approved to operate a robotaxi fleet anything like what Musk envisions.

In written comments last year, Tesla criticized some of the California DMV’s proposed revisions to autonomous-driving rules, questioning the need for testing on state roads and minimum-mile requirements. The company also complained about “overly burdensome reporting โ€‹requirements” for crashes and other system failures.

Musk has often โ€Œsuggested California regulations are the main impediment to deploying robotaxis there. On an October 2024 earnings call, he said California has โ€œquite a โ€‹long regulatory approval process.โ€

โ€œIโ€™d be shocked if we donโ€™t get approved next year,โ€ he added, โ€œbut itโ€™s just not something we totally control.โ€

(Reporting โ€‹by Chris Kirkham in Los Angeles; Editing by Brian Thevenot and Matthew Lewis)

Source link