Oracle severed 21,000 employees during an AI spending spree, then hit a $7 billion Wisconsin power hurdle
Chris Jung/NurPhoto via Getty Images The race to dominate artificial intelligence is becoming one of the most expensive corporate contests in history. Amazon, Microsoft, Google parent Alphabet and Meta are expected to spend about $600 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026, according to Reuters. The historic spending spree is squeezing cash flow and putting pressure…
The race to dominate artificial intelligence is becoming one of the most expensive corporate contests in history.
Amazon, Microsoft, Google parent Alphabet and Meta are expected to spend about $600 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026, according to Reuters. The historic spending spree is squeezing cash flow and putting pressure on companies to prove that their investments in chips, servers and data centers will eventually pay off.
Must Read
Oracle has made one of the biggest bets. The company has emerged as a major supplier of AI computing capacity after reportedly signing a $300 billion contract with OpenAI, but the data centers needed to fulfill that agreement have contributed to a cash crunch. Oracle subsequently pursued thousands of job cuts as it looked for ways to fund its expansion, Reuters reported in March.
By the end of its 2026 fiscal year, Oracle’s workforce had fallen by approximately 21,000 employees, or 13%, from 162,000 to 141,000. The reduction came as Oracle restructured its business, partly in response to the adoption of AI within its operations.
Now, Oracle’s weakened financial position could make it significantly more expensive to secure electricity for one of the data centers at the heart of its AI ambitions.
Wisconsin regulators want a $7 billion guarantee
Oracle is involved in a planned nearly one-gigawatt data center in Port Washington, Wisconsin, that is expected to help the company fulfill its OpenAI contract.
But the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin has declined to loosen financial safeguards designed to prevent residential electricity customers from bearing the costs if a massive data center fails or closes, according to the Financial Times.
Under We Energies’ “very large customer” tariff, data center operators with an S&P credit rating below A- must provide collateral covering the power plants and transmission infrastructure constructed to serve them.
Oracle was rated BBB, two notches below the threshold, when the requirements were considered. S&P subsequently downgraded the company to BBB-, leaving it one notch above junk status. The ratings agency cited Oracle’s heavy AI spending and uncertain path toward generating enough profits from those investments.
As a result, Oracle could be required to provide more than $7 billion in cash or a letter of credit before the facility receives power. Maintaining that guarantee could cost the company more than $100 million annually.
Oracle has challenged the requirement in court, arguing that the added financing costs could discourage future investment in Wisconsin. The company said it remains committed to the approximately $15 billion project and would provide guarantees ensuring Wisconsin ratepayers are not exposed to its financial risks.
Regulators have held firm, stating that existing customers should not subsidize data centers “now or in the future.”
The concern extends well beyond Wisconsin. At least 24 states have approved large-load tariffs containing special pricing, minimum contract terms, exit fees or collateral requirements for data centers and other major electricity users.
Read More: 7 top habits of ‘quietly wealthy’ Americans. How many do you follow?
AI spending is forcing difficult tradeoffs elsewhere
Oracle is not the only company finding that AI costs can quickly overwhelm budgets.
Uber exhausted its planned 2026 AI coding budget within four months as thousands of engineers adopted tools such as Claude Code. One two-hour session reportedly generated a bill of approximately $1,200, while some heavy users consumed between $500 and $2,000 per month.
Microsoft has also cut jobs while investing heavily in AI infrastructure. In July 2025, the company announced plans to eliminate approximately 9,000 positions, or nearly 4% of its workforce, after committing $80 billion in capital spending for that fiscal year. Reuters reported that the cost of expanding Microsoft’s AI infrastructure was weighing on its cloud margins.
Microsoft announced another 4,800 job cuts in July 2026 as companies continued shifting resources toward AI infrastructure.
Amazon and Meta have similarly announced thousands of job cuts while pouring money into AI. Reuters noted that layoffs and even employee buyouts have become part of the financial tradeoff as technology companies try to fund the industry’s unprecedented infrastructure buildout.
Oracle’s dispute in Wisconsin shows that cutting payroll and raising money may not be enough. As data centers consume more power and require billions of dollars in new electrical infrastructure, companies must also convince utilities and regulators that their AI bets are financially sound.
What To Read Next
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
This article originally appeared on Moneywise.com under the title: Oracle severed 21,000 employees during an AI spending spree, then hit a $7 billion Wisconsin power hurdle
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
