Elon Musk’s SpaceX began trading Friday on the Nasdaq under the ticker NASDAQ:SPCX — the largest IPO on record, priced at $135 a share for an IPO valuation near $1.77 trillion. For most Americans saving for retirement, they’re wondering if SpaceX is about to land in their 401(k) whether they want it or not.
Shares closed up about 19% at $160.95, lifting the company’s market value above $2 trillion and making Musk the world’s first trillionaire on paper.
Must Read
A wave of coverage has warned that passive savers are about to absorb shares of a company that lost billions in 2025 — as relaxed index rules pull SpaceX into widely held funds. Prof G Markets co-host Ed Elson reinforced the risk in his read of the S-1: “If you own the Nasdaq,” he wrote, “you’re about to own SpaceX.”
Vanguard, which runs the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (NYSEARCA:VTI) — one of the most widely held funds in American retirement accounts — says the alarm misreads one important thing.
What the SpaceX index fund warnings get right
SpaceX will enter major US stock indexes far sooner than the old rules allowed — and the funds that track those indexes don’t choose their holdings. When a company joins an index, the trackers buy it on rebalance day — the periodic reset when funds realign holdings — in proportion to its weight, regardless of price.
Part of why SpaceX qualifies at all can be attributed to a rule change this spring. Alex Poukchanski, Director of Index Analytics at Morningstar Indexes — which administers the CRSP US Market Indexes benchmark behind Vanguard’s total-market fund — confirmed the shift to Moneywise. The change gave more flexibility to mega-cap companies that, in his words, increasingly arrive at the market with “much higher relative market caps but lower relative market float.” SpaceX, listing with roughly 5% of its shares available to the public (1), is a perfect example.
The five-trading-day fast-track that lets a large IPO enter quickly has been in place since 2017. What changed this spring was the eligibility screen — the float test — not the speed. And total-market indexes like CRSP’s have never screened companies on profitability in the first place, which is why an unprofitable company can be included at all. Past fast-track names entered on the same clock. Airbnb and Coinbase were both added to the CRSP indexes within five trading days of listing.
MSCI’s rules (2) add another forced buyer. A large IPO can enter its Global Standard Indexes about 10 trading days after listing — pulling SpaceX into the global funds that track them, on top of the demand from Nasdaq-100 and Russell trackers.
The one thing the panic gets wrong
Rodney Comegys, Chief Investment Officer of Vanguard Capital Management and Head of Global Equity, told Moneywise that index inclusion is “transparent, rules-based and phased, not instantaneous.” There is, he said, no full-weight inclusion on day one — which means passive flows tend to be “more measured than often assumed.”
The image of index funds dumping billions into SpaceX the moment it lists doesn’t match how inclusion actually works. Funds add a new name over defined windows, based on eligibility criteria — not in a single surge of buying that ignores the price.
Comegys also pushed back on the idea that a company’s headline valuation should drive how much of it a fund holds. Well-designed indexes rely on free float — the shares actually available to investors — “rather than a firm’s total equity market capitalization,” he said. Index weights should reflect what investors can truly own, in his words, “not the story attached to an IPO.”
One limit to what Vanguard would say: the company did not address how quickly its total-market fund would reflect a SpaceX inclusion, or whether it would exercise discretion to delay or phase in a position rather than track the index mechanically. The index itself moves on a known clock — Morningstar’s fast-track adds an eligible name within five trading days of listing — but whether Vanguard’s fund mirrors that pace, or smooths it, is the open question. Moneywise put it directly and did not receive a response on that point before publication. So Comegys’s comments describe how inclusion is paced in general — the precise timing and weight of any SpaceX position in the fund remain unconfirmed.
Read More: About 1 in 5 Americans over 50 has zero retirement savings — here’s the catch-up plan you can actually use
Where the SpaceX worry still holds
Even if index fund inclusion is phased, the underlying worry doesn’t fully go away. The buying that does occur is still price-insensitive — index funds buy because the rules say to, not because they judge SpaceX a good deal near $1.77 trillion. Elson, who called the offering’s valuation detached from its financials, noted that SpaceX lost $4.9 billion in 2025 and would price at a multiple far above past tech debuts. Its prospectus discloses an accumulated deficit — total losses since 2002 — of $41.3 billion. And the broader debate over whether benchmarks should admit unprofitable mega-caps remains unsettled. S&P Dow Jones Indices declined (3) to relax the profitability and seasoning rules that govern the S&P 500, leaving SpaceX out of that benchmark until it can post four straight quarters of GAAP profit — which will likely not be before mid-2027.
President and COO Gwynne Shotwell told CNBC (4) that Musk “wanted regular people to be able to buy the stock, and a lot of folks participated at the retail level.” SpaceX set aside 30% of shares for retail buyers (5) — an unusually large share. Buying in directly still carries friction. Brokerages handling the IPO impose “flipping” rules that penalize selling too soon, and Fidelity’s lowered $2,000 minimum comes with restrictions that can bar repeat sellers from future offerings.
What the SpaceX IPO means for your 401(k)
None of this is investment advice. It’s a map of how the exposure actually reaches you.
If you hold a broad index fund, SpaceX is likely coming to your account by default — but in small, phased doses, not a day-one slug, and as one position among thousands. That’s Comegys’s larger point: even the largest IPO, he said, represents “a small piece of a diversified portfolio.” Diversification, he argued, lets investors participate in innovation while reducing reliance on the fate of any single company.
The rules did change, and the exposure is real. By the account of the people who run the fund, it arrives in phases — not the day-one flood the warnings describe.
You May Also Like
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Article Sources
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1); MSCI (2); S&P Global (3); CNBC (4); Reuters (5)
This article originally appeared on Moneywise.com under the title: The SpaceX IPO has investors sweating over their 401(k)s — but Vanguard’s CIO says the panic gets one thing wrong
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
